Skip to content

Follow-up on P-Zombies @nytimes

March 23, 2013

Recall from last week, ZombieLaw mentioned a column in the Stone at NYTimes by Gary Gutting about zombie thought experiments hypotheticals regarding philosophical p-zombies. Now, Gutting has a follow-up piece addressing the over 800 comments received on the first one. See “Mary and the Zombies: Consciousness Revisited” by Gary Gutting:

Many comments found both arguments utterly and obviously inadequate. But the dismissive comments often missed important points, as other comments pointed out. In any case, there were a remarkable number of intelligent and perceptive discussions. I can cite only a very small sample of what was said and apologize to the vast majority whose contributions I don’t mention.

He goes on to mention Daniel Dennett and before concluding with link to Robert Kirk’s “Zombies” in Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Gutting writes:

Reflecting on the discussion overall, my conclusion is that neither the Mary nor the Zombie Argument makes a decisive case against physicalism. But the arguments do not make obvious, stupid mistakes. They are based on premises with a great deal of intuitive appeal (that science can’t tell us what red looks like subjectively and that a zombie is logically possible), and these premises seem to lead quite directly to the conclusion that consciousness is non-physical.

zombie gary gutting nytimes

Advertisements

From → choice

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: